You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘LEED’ tag.

I enrolled in the LEED AP BD+C (Building Design + Construction) specialty which requires 30 continuing education units over two years.  With my initial two-year period coming to a close, the forms needed to be filled out showing my continuing education.

Fortunately, I have been able to work as a consultant on several LEED projects at Hutton Architecture Studio, easily providing 10 hours of project experience, including the required six LEED specific hours.  I was able to earn the remaining hours by going to regional conferences (eight hours), attending live presentations (five hours), self-study (five hours), and becoming a licensed architect (two hours).  The trickiest part was earning 24 prescriptive credential maintenance hours in specific categories as required by GBCI during the first two-year reporting period, which include the following categories:

  • Project site factors
  • Water management
  • Project systems & energy impacts
  • Acquisition, installation, and management of project materials
  • Improvements to the indoor environment
  • Stakeholder involvement in innovation
  • Project surrounding & public outreach

Tracking the prescriptive credential maintenance was a little complicated, but it was definitely worth completing in order to avoid the other option of getting the LEED AP BD+C specialty – retesting.  And, as posted in a previous entry, the benefits of becoming a LEED AP + specialty are worth it!

Although I didn’t use any online course providers, I did learn that there are several GBCI Education Reviewing Body (ERB) approved educational courses on-line (, many of which are free.  I still prefer live presentations where I can ask the facilitator questions, such as the Rocky Mountain Green Conference ( where my coworker, Mark Broyles, presented last year.

Be sure to also refer to the GBCI Credentialing Maintenance Guide ( for the most current requirements.


The United States Green Building Council (USGBC) Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI) launched new categories for LEED Accredited Professionals (LEED APs) in 2009 in order to distinguish the title in the marketplace.  By the end of October 2011, existing LEED APs were given two choices:  either keep their existing LEED AP designation as a “legacy” or enroll in a specialty, most typically Building Design and Construction (BD+C).

I believe that the LEED AP + specialty designation adds value by ensuring to the client that an architect is up-to-date and focused on current sustainable design practices.  LEED APs without specialty (legacy) may have passed the LEED exam 10 years ago and never actually worked on a green building.  With the new GBCI requirements, practitioners are not even eligible to take the LEED AP exam without LEED project experience.  LEED registered projects will also benefit from having a LEED AP + specialty.  The 2012 LEED draft will require a LEED AP + specialty in order to earn the Innovation in Design credit for having a LEED AP on the team.  Having a legacy LEED AP on the project team will no longer earn the extra point.

In order to become a LEED AP + specialty, you have to agree to complete 30 hours of sustainable continuing education every two years.  Although it will take a little extra work and add to the already tedious task of tracking continuing education, it is worthwhile to market and differentiate yourself amongst over 130,000 LEED APs.

So, as licensed architects in Colorado, we are required to complete continuing education requirements in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public.  In addition, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) requires 18 hours of continuing education in order to maintain membership.  In 2009, the AIA also added the requirement of four hours of sustainable design per year.  However, the LEED AP with specialty credential is unique in that its continuing education requirement is solely based on sustainable building design and LEED-specific learning.  Although continuing education is valuable to each member of the profession, how much is too much?  And is there truly a benefit to our clients by each organization requiring their own?